Skip to main content

The Ups and Downs of NHL Penalties

Welcome to all the visitors stopping by today via the Hockey News, and thanks to Rand Simon for his kind words. His note that some of the stuff I'm doing this season related to his arbitration work for Sean Avery over the summer is just the sort of thing I was hoping would be picked up on, the fact that statistical analysis can help answer some interesting questions related to team and individual performance in the NHL. From Simon's blog at the Hockey News today:

Through analyzing shift charts and box scores we were able to determine that Avery was a "plus" in the penalty department last season as he drew more power plays than his penalties caused shorthanded situations.

The statistic helped counteract the Rangers' argument that Avery was an undisciplined player who was hurting his team by taking too many penalties.


I've been tracking Penalties Drawn so far this year, and while Sean Avery has missed most of the early action he's a player that I plan on following through the course of the season, to answer just that question. Which agitators succeed in goading their opponents into taking penalties more often than they themselves leave their team shorthanded?

As a further wrinkle to the Penalties Drawn numbers I've been working on so far, I thought I'd bring Penalties Committed into the mix to come up with a Penalty Plus/Minus figure. In doing so, I exclude coincidental penalties, so if you see a discrepancy in Drawn or Committed, check that out first. Here's a quick snapshot of what I've got so far in that realm, with the leaders and laggards in this category (data through the games of Sunday, November 4). See, Rangers fans, Scott Gomez is at least leading the NHL in something for all that dough!


PlayerDrawnCommittedPen +/-
NYR #19 GOMEZ12111
L.A #13 CAMMALLERI11011
L.A #11 KOPITAR12210
WSH #8 OVECHKIN1129
DET #13 DATSYUK1028
PIT #87 CROSBY1477
EDM #83 HEMSKY927
CAR #13 WHITNEY707
CBJ #61 NASH1046
CAR #17 BRIND'AMOUR1046
MTL #21 HIGGINS936
DET #40 ZETTERBERG936
STL #22 BOYES826
PHX #11 HANZAL826
MTL #73 RYDER826
BUF #19 CONNOLLY826
PHX #34 WINNIK716
NYR #25 PRUCHA716
N.J #16 ZUBRUS716
VAN #17 KESLER1055
BUF #61 AFINOGENOV945
FLA #12 JOKINEN835
DAL #15 HAGMAN835
CAR #12 STAAL835
VAN #15 RITCHIE725
ANA #32 MOEN725
T.B #26 ST. LOUIS615
ATL #13 KOZLOV615
OTT #44 EAVES615
BUF #29 POMINVILLE505
FLA #10 BOOTH505

And at the bottom end of the list...
(EDIT: Initial post missed those who had drawn 0 penalties, I've corrected that)

PlayerDrawnCommittedPen +/-
TOR #56 WOZNIEWSKI011-11
CAR #11 WILLIAMS19-8
DET #3 LILJA210-8
NYR #51 TYUTIN08-8
PHX #13 CARCILLO08-8
PIT #55 GONCHAR19-8
TOR #31 KUBINA19-8
ATL #28 HAVELID07-7
CAR #6 HEDICAN18-7
L.A #3 JOHNSON18-7
MIN #8 BURNS29-7
PHI #22 KNUBLE18-7
S.J #10 EHRHOFF18-7
ATL #16 HOLIK17-6
BOS #91 SAVARD17-6
CBJ #97 KLESLA17-6
CGY #17 GODARD06-6
CHI #7 SEABROOK06-6
DAL #43 BOUCHER06-6
EDM #23 TARNSTROM06-6
OTT #25 NEIL28-6
VAN #2 OHLUND410-6
WSH #2 POTHIER17-6
WSH #4 ERSKINE28-6


See, this is why I picked Sergei Gonchar up for my Fantasy Hockey team. He's not just an offensive producer from the blue line, but he picks up the PIMs as well. Heck, I like to call him the "Happy Hooker" since he's led the NHL in Hooking penalties for the last two seasons.

Popular posts from this blog

Cheer up, it's the holidays...

Why is it that various media outlets continue trying to put their own spin on the "what's wrong with the NHL" story? Our latest example comes from The Hockey News , in a piece by Jay Greenburg entitled, "Excitement Level On The Decline." Take the opening sentence: Attendance is down and yet still up from before the lockout, leaving it arguable whether buildings in New Jersey and Florida are half-full or half empty. It's no surprise that attendance is down from last season, particularly if you compare the first half of 2005-06 to the first half of this year. Coming out of the lockout, there were legions of fans starved to see the on-ice product, particularly in light of the massive rule changes. This year is more indicative of business as usual, so the fact that the league is above pre-lockout levels is a positive. Toss in the projection that overall revenues are increasing despite a 1% decrease in attendance, and I'd say that paying fans have come back

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012 , which include specific revenue targets: I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader. It's not unrea

Social Media, Internet Marketing, and Real, Paying Customers - it really works!

Applying the basic tenets of internet marketing (SEO best practices and social media network building) have helped me grow the readership and engagement over at On The Forecheck tremendously in recent years, but lately I've been wondering if those same techniques could be applied to small- or medium-sized local businesses, to help them drive real, tangible business results. I'm talking about not just drawing idle hockey fans looking to a blog so they can muse over line combinations, but helping businesses connect with potential customers in ways that otherwise wouldn't occur. Recently, I was able to help make just such a thing happen, and it shows just how great the opportunities are for small, local businesses which may not have the resources or skills available to extend their brand effectively on the internet.