Skip to main content


Got any good books to recommend?

Greatest Hits from Working the Net:

Harlow Salon - one of the very best hair salons in Nashville TN.

Will David Freeman open the pocketbook?

Just how much are the Predators' owners willing to spend to build a winner? Paul over at Geek Thoughts pointed out quite a whopper that's buried in an interview posted on the Nashville Predators website today with David Freeman: Have you starting planning the budget for next season?
DF: Sure. Yes. Strategically it's probably not good for us to talk about that publicly for competitive reasons. Our budget will be significantly higher than it was this year. In fact, I'm quite certain we will spend more on payroll next year than at any time in the history of the club. We're that committed to building this team right back up.

This year, the team's salary cap number comes in just under $36 million, so when Freeman calls for the biggest Predators payroll ever, that certainly means a big step off the NHL's required salary minimum, which is set $16 million below the top end of the Salary Cap. This year, that cap is roughly $52 million, so if you figure in a 5% increase, making it $54.5 million or so next year, the minimum allowed under the CBA would be $38.5 million. I had a bit of a time finding info from 2006-7, but it looks like the Preds total salary then was well north of $40 million, so is Freeman talking about a $43 million+ payroll? That would be sweet, but what might it mean in terms of the roster?

First of all, GM David Poile has been very clear that he wants to sign his Restricted Free Agents (Shea Weber, Ryan Suter, and Martin Erat, mainly). It looks like they've already got $33 million committed for next year for players already under contract. If you pencil Weber in for something close to $4 million per season in his next deal, with Suter and Erat around $5 million per year between the two of them (that is a wild guess off the top of my head), that doesn't leave much to do the following: sign a 2nd goaltender besides Chris Mason, retain Kevin Klein and/or Ville Koistinen, and sign 3 forwards to fill out the 3rd & 4th lines (guys like Martin Gelinas, Jan Hlavac, Darcy Hordichuk and Rich Peverley will all be unrestricted free agents).

In other words, this increase in payroll likely reflects a commitment to retain good, young NHL players entering their 2nd contract, rather than a shopping spree over the summer for free agents. That's not a bad thing at all, but it certainly won't be Christmas in July for Predators fans.

The biggest gain we'll see next year is if Steve Sullivan's back recovers and he can resume playing NHL hockey; if so, that would represent a huge addition to the Nashville lineup, and position them nicely amidst Western Conference contenders that often lack offensive depth.

Popular posts from this blog

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012, which include specific revenue targets:
I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader.

It's not unreasonabl…

Canadian Baloney, starring James Mirtle

A tireless refrain from the Canadian media is that Nashville is an absolute failure as a hockey market, and failing to move the team north of the border is an exercise in folly by the NHL.

Our latest exhibit comes from James Mirtle, usually one of the more thoughtful hockey bloggers extant:
But Nashville, quite simply, has proven it cannot sustain an NHL hockey team. Even with the lowest ticket prices in the entire league (I know: I've looked into flying there for a game or two) and a ridiculously forgiving arena lease, the team has had attendance issues despite having one of the best records in the league.

It's not a matter of Canadians not wanting teams in the southern U.S.; I've argued time and again in favour of teams like Dallas and Tampa Bay that have supported their teams and really brought something to the table in terms of bringing news fans and new energy to the game. That's a good thing.

The Predators, however, are not that, not in the beginning and certainly no…

Hooray for PythagenPuck

Back in November, around the quarter-mark of the NHL regular season, I wrote a piece looking at Expected Winning Percentages for each team, based on their Goals For/Goals Against ratio, using the PythagenPuck method as outlined in Alan Ryder's "Win Probabilities" article over at Hockey Analytics. Since we're approaching the end of the campaign, I thought it worth revisiting the two assertions I made back in November - that the Ottawa Senators were capable of getting back into the playoff race, and that the Boston Bruins were in danger of a freefall to the bottom of the standings.

Just to review, the basic idea behind win probability models like PythagenPuck is that over the course of a season, the Goals For and Goals Against numbers can be used to derive a team's winning percentage, within a a surprisingly narrow margin of error. For instance, if you only had GF/GA information, you could make a very good stab at projecting what the standings would look like. The w…