Skip to main content


Got any good books to recommend?

Greatest Hits from Working the Net:

Harlow Salon - one of the very best hair salons in Nashville TN.

Local hacks take a whack

Thanks to a miserable hatchet job at the Tennessean, Predators fans are left with another round of caterwauling from critics who want to see the team relocated either to Kansas City or Southern Ontario.

Thursday afternoon, the Tennessean broke a "news update" that the prospective ownership group was negotiating changes to the Sommet Center lease that could have Nashville taxpayers paying "$5 million more per year to keep the Predators in Nashville," and "the buyers tried to keep the details from the public." Friday morning the paper came out with a further article which revised the $5 million figure down to $3 million, and included PDF's of the proposal (obtained via a public records request) and two emails, each addressed to the mayoral campaigns of Karl Dean and Bob Clement (obtained by the paper, but how?).

The implication was twofold: first, that the local group was seeking deeper subsidy from the city, and secondly, they were doing it in secret.

Tackling the second issue is straightforward - this is a proposal that's being laid out by the new ownership team, and isn't yet in a finalized form that goes up for public debate. The outgoing mayor of Nashville basically has nothing to do with this process other than to provide some analytical support, so the back-and-forth negotiation hasn't even truly gotten rolling.

The first issue, that being the charge that the new owners are simply looking for handouts from the city, is a much more complicated affair. The biggest oversight in the Tennessean's report is the omission of a critical part of the propsal: that in exchange for management fees from the city, the owners would take over the risk of operating loss at the Sommet Center [note: correction made here].

Quoth the proposal:

"Under the [ed: current] Management Agreement, the Sports Authority is responsible for virtually all capital and operating expenses associated with the operation of the Sommet Center. If "Operating Expenses" for a particular period exceed "Operating Revenues" for that period, the Sports Authority is responsible for that "Operating Loss". If "Operating Revenues" exceed "Operating Expenses", the Sports Authority is entitled to that "Operating Income" for such period. Since entering into the Management Agreement, the Sports Authority has experienced only Operating Losses."

According to the
Nashville City Paper, those Operating Losses have averaged $5 million per year. In the next section down, the proposal says that the Manager (the new ownership group's corporate body, PHC) would be responsible for all Operating Expenses and entitled to all Operating Revenues, subject to some terms that are spelled out in lugubrious detail. David Freeman has also gone on record saying that they are attempting to tie the source and scale of that Management Fee to revenue streams generated by hockey, such as sales tax generated by the facility, etc., rather than simply drawing out of general funds. It's not as simple as them asking for an $X million check to be written to underwrite their hockey team.

The Tennessean makes no mention of the removal of a $5 million Operating Loss from Metro's shoulders as a result of this proposal, only the cost of the Management Fee being requested. Rather than present in practical terms how the deal would likely shake out (which is difficult because some areas are still left open to negotiation), the Tennessean only focuses on what the ownership group is asking for, not what they are offering in return.
Now, of course, the broader portion of the hockey world is picking up the Tennessean's story and writing another round of "hockey can't work in Nashville, why are these locals getting the team instead of Jim Balsillie" articles. For a paper that is trimming staff, perhaps this was a desperate ploy to sell papers with a "businessmen are secretly conspiring to steal your tax dollars!" angle, but even in the best case scenario, they've lined the city up for a repeat of the negative press it's been getting all summer long.

Popular posts from this blog

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012, which include specific revenue targets:
I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader.

It's not unreasonabl…

Hooray for PythagenPuck

Back in November, around the quarter-mark of the NHL regular season, I wrote a piece looking at Expected Winning Percentages for each team, based on their Goals For/Goals Against ratio, using the PythagenPuck method as outlined in Alan Ryder's "Win Probabilities" article over at Hockey Analytics. Since we're approaching the end of the campaign, I thought it worth revisiting the two assertions I made back in November - that the Ottawa Senators were capable of getting back into the playoff race, and that the Boston Bruins were in danger of a freefall to the bottom of the standings.

Just to review, the basic idea behind win probability models like PythagenPuck is that over the course of a season, the Goals For and Goals Against numbers can be used to derive a team's winning percentage, within a a surprisingly narrow margin of error. For instance, if you only had GF/GA information, you could make a very good stab at projecting what the standings would look like. The w…

Where are my tickets, Mr. Holland?

While working on a piece about the 10th anniversary of the great Colorado/Detroit game at Joe Louis Arena, I caught myself reflecting on some of the great games I've had the fortune of seeing in Detroit during the 1990's, through a variety of means. Then another thing came to mind - when I'm in attendance, the Red Wings win. I'm on a huge personal winning streak here, so perhaps the Red Wings front office would want to bolster their chances during the upcoming playoffs and make sure I'm in the house for those critical games? I can make myself available...

June 4, 1995: Detroit takes Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals from Chicago, 3-2 (although the Hawks put one of the goalpost as the final horn sounds). Wow, has it been that long since the Blackhawks achieved anything? Ticket courtesy of a college buddy who had a spare.

October 13, 1995: The Wings pummel the Edmonton Oilers in their home opener, 9-0. After the painful Finals sweep against New Jersey the…