Thursday afternoon, the Tennessean broke a "news update" that the prospective ownership group was negotiating changes to the Sommet Center lease that could have Nashville taxpayers paying "$5 million more per year to keep the Predators in Nashville," and "the buyers tried to keep the details from the public." Friday morning the paper came out with a further article which revised the $5 million figure down to $3 million, and included PDF's of the proposal (obtained via a public records request) and two emails, each addressed to the mayoral campaigns of Karl Dean and Bob Clement (obtained by the paper, but how?).
Tackling the second issue is straightforward - this is a proposal that's being laid out by the new ownership team, and isn't yet in a finalized form that goes up for public debate. The outgoing mayor of Nashville basically has nothing to do with this process other than to provide some analytical support, so the back-and-forth negotiation hasn't even truly gotten rolling.
The first issue, that being the charge that the new owners are simply looking for handouts from the city, is a much more complicated affair. The biggest oversight in the Tennessean's report is the omission of a critical part of the propsal: that in exchange for management fees from the city, the owners would take over the risk of operating loss at the Sommet Center [note: correction made here].
"Under the [ed: current] Management Agreement, the Sports Authority is responsible for virtually all capital and operating expenses associated with the operation of the Sommet Center. If "Operating Expenses" for a particular period exceed "Operating Revenues" for that period, the Sports Authority is responsible for that "Operating Loss". If "Operating Revenues" exceed "Operating Expenses", the Sports Authority is entitled to that "Operating Income" for such period. Since entering into the Management Agreement, the Sports Authority has experienced only Operating Losses."
According to the Nashville City Paper, those Operating Losses have averaged $5 million per year. In the next section down, the proposal says that the Manager (the new ownership group's corporate body, PHC) would be responsible for all Operating Expenses and entitled to all Operating Revenues, subject to some terms that are spelled out in lugubrious detail. David Freeman has also gone on record saying that they are attempting to tie the source and scale of that Management Fee to revenue streams generated by hockey, such as sales tax generated by the facility, etc., rather than simply drawing out of general funds. It's not as simple as them asking for an $X million check to be written to underwrite their hockey team.
The Tennessean makes no mention of the removal of a $5 million Operating Loss from Metro's shoulders as a result of this proposal, only the cost of the Management Fee being requested. Rather than present in practical terms how the deal would likely shake out (which is difficult because some areas are still left open to negotiation), the Tennessean only focuses on what the ownership group is asking for, not what they are offering in return.