Skip to main content

Endorsements

Got any good books to recommend?

Greatest Hits from Working the Net:

Harlow Salon - one of the very best hair salons in Nashville TN.

Good seeds and Bad seeds...

Now is the time of year when we start to see articles describing how winning the President's Trophy really isn't that big a deal, and that teams like Buffalo, Nashville, Detroit and Anaheim are better off taking things easy and making sure they're ready for the playoffs. After all, as quoted from this morning's Tennessean, "only six Presidents' Trophy winners have gone on to win the Stanley Cup in the 20 years the league has given out the award."

Wow, that sounds horrible! All that hard effort over 82 games, and chances are the President's Trophy winner won't even win the Cup!

Think for a minute, however, and you realize that 6 out of 20 really isn't that bad - 30%, in fact. When you consider that the Stanley Cup Playoff is a 16-team tournament, saying that one team in particular has a 30% shot at winning makes them a pretty strong favorite.

I went back through the 1994-2006 playoffs to see how well teams of different seeds have done in the playoffs. Before 1994 you had two rounds of divisional playoffs before the conference final, so you really didn't have 1-8 seeding on each side as you do in today's NHL. Over that time, the President's Trophy winner has won, on average, 2.33 playoff series per season. Comparatively, the top seed in the opposite conference and both #2 seeds averaged only 1.08 series victories. Below is the complete table showing average series victories per seed:

SeedAvg. Series Wins
Pres. Trophy2.33
#1 Opp.1.08
#21.08
#31.29
#41.25
#50.29
#60.67
#70.83
#80.38


There are some interesting fluctuations in there - for starters, the fact that the worst performing seed is the 5th spot (out of 24 #5 seeds over the last 12 seasons, they've been eliminated in the first round 20 times!). My guess there is that often the #4 seed is a better team than #3 or possibly #2, since division winners automatically get the higher slots, and thus the #5 is facing tougher opposition. The other particularly odd bit is how the #1 Opp. seed (top seed in the opposite conference from the President's Trophy winner) and the #2 seeds both fare worse than the #3 and #4 seeds. Your guess is as good as mine as to why that is the case. Regardless, the dominance of President's Trophy winners is clear.

Even just during the twelve years I'm looking at here, the President's Trophy winner won the Stanley Cup four times (33%), followed by #2 seeds with three (12.5%). That's not very close, considering there are two #2 seeds each year, and only one President's Trophy team. The #1 seed from the opposite conference has won once (2004's Tampa Bay Lightning), and two #3 seeds have won (Detroit in 1997 and 1998). New Jersey is the only team to win from the #4 and #5 seeds, in 2000 and 1995 respectively.

Perhaps a team that fights hard to the finish and wins the President's Trophy has the momentum and mindset to achieve great things in the postseason, and teams that let up may not find it so easy to "flip the switch" and start winning again. Regardless, it seems here that compiling the best regular season record might be worth something after all. Shocking, ain't it?

Popular posts from this blog

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012, which include specific revenue targets:
I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader.

It's not unreasonabl…

Canadian Baloney, starring James Mirtle

A tireless refrain from the Canadian media is that Nashville is an absolute failure as a hockey market, and failing to move the team north of the border is an exercise in folly by the NHL.

Our latest exhibit comes from James Mirtle, usually one of the more thoughtful hockey bloggers extant:
But Nashville, quite simply, has proven it cannot sustain an NHL hockey team. Even with the lowest ticket prices in the entire league (I know: I've looked into flying there for a game or two) and a ridiculously forgiving arena lease, the team has had attendance issues despite having one of the best records in the league.

It's not a matter of Canadians not wanting teams in the southern U.S.; I've argued time and again in favour of teams like Dallas and Tampa Bay that have supported their teams and really brought something to the table in terms of bringing news fans and new energy to the game. That's a good thing.

The Predators, however, are not that, not in the beginning and certainly no…

Hooray for PythagenPuck

Back in November, around the quarter-mark of the NHL regular season, I wrote a piece looking at Expected Winning Percentages for each team, based on their Goals For/Goals Against ratio, using the PythagenPuck method as outlined in Alan Ryder's "Win Probabilities" article over at Hockey Analytics. Since we're approaching the end of the campaign, I thought it worth revisiting the two assertions I made back in November - that the Ottawa Senators were capable of getting back into the playoff race, and that the Boston Bruins were in danger of a freefall to the bottom of the standings.

Just to review, the basic idea behind win probability models like PythagenPuck is that over the course of a season, the Goals For and Goals Against numbers can be used to derive a team's winning percentage, within a a surprisingly narrow margin of error. For instance, if you only had GF/GA information, you could make a very good stab at projecting what the standings would look like. The w…