Skip to main content

Those Especially Special Teams

There I was, idly clicking my way around the hockey blogosphere, when, like the Bat Signal cast against the cloudy skies of Gotham, I spied a call for help. At the end of a post covering the All-Star Game and how perhaps it might be improved, Ritch from American Hockey Fan had a question...

Why not have the best Powerplay in the league face off against the best PK? Who would that be, I wonder? San Jose vs. Montreal, maybe? Perhaps the Forechecker will come to my aid again.

Fear not, good netizen - I'm always in need of topical inspiration, so let's take a look...

The NHL stat in this area merely covers percentage of opportunities converted. On that front, San Jose has the top power play (25.8%), and Vancouver the top penalty kill (88.4%). There, we have our answer, right? If we did, this would be an awfully short piece, that's for sure.

A great source of special teams statistics can be found over at, where you can find a breakdown of teams on a 60-minute basis (note: mc79hockey's stats are currently updated through Game 472, which is a few weeks old). In other words, given 60 minutes of power play time, it shows how many shots and goals are being racked up (for and against) by the various teams. Looking at power play numbers as an example, if you take Goals For/60 Minutes, and subtract Goals Against/60 Minutes (due to shorthanded goals allowed), you get a Goal Differential/60 Minutes. This gets us past the two major flaws in the NHL's basic power play figures, which only reflect percentage of opportunities converted. First, due to penalties being called at different times, you can have a PP lasting only a few seconds, but it counts in the NHL figure just as if it was a full five-minute major. Therefore, normalizing the power play output against a standard time period gives a better picture of actual production. Secondly, there is no consideration for a sloppy power play that gives up shorthanded goals, or an opportunistic PK that scores some of their own. I took the liberty of updating the Goal Differential/60 Minutes figure, which is indicated in the table below:

TeamPP Goals ForPP Goals AgainstPP TimePP Diff/ 60 Min
San Jose Sharks632391:549.34
Montreal Canadiens513347:048.30
Anaheim Ducks551407:247.95
New York Rangers441407:236.33
Florida Panthers413360:236.33
Toronto Maple Leafs505431:116.26
Dallas Stars474429:436.00
Pittsburgh Penguins537462:125.97
Boston Bruins458372:295.96
Colorado Avalanche446391:195.83
Nashville Predators452444:305.80
Los Angeles Kings474444:355.80
Washington Capitals455430:235.58
Tampa Bay Lightning477436:295.50
Detroit Red Wings425404:205.49
Vancouver Canucks456431:355.42
New York Islanders354344:475.39
New Jersey Devils427390:125.38
Carolina Hurricanes465471:085.22
Edmonton Oilers383418:185.02
Columbus Blue Jackets456466:225.02
Ottawa Senators4510422:374.97
Atlanta Thrashers427437:544.80
Minnesota Wild417427:184.77
Calgary Flames364413:474.64
Buffalo Sabres427457:264.59
St. Louis Blues313373:554.49
Phoenix Coyotes388415:454.33
Philadelphia Flyers337390:194.00
Chicago Blackhawks233395:593.03

Indeed, San Jose is way out in front with the man advantage, followed by Montreal, Anaheim, and then the bulk of the NHL grouped in a range from just under 5.00 to 6.33 Goals per 60 Minutes. You really see the Goal Differential factor come into play towards the bottom of these standings, where a team like Edmonton jumps several places compared to their typical NHL Power Play ranking, because the other teams around them give up so many more shorthanded goals. Similarly, those young Pittsburgh Penguins have given up seven shorthanded scores against, which drops them behind four other teams with fewer PP Goals For.

On the PK side, we see Montreal on top (1st in PK, 2nd in PP, no wonder they're doing so well), followed by Minnesota and Vancouver as the only teams with a Goal Differential/60 Minutes better than -4.00. According to the typical Penalty Killing percentage, the Canadiens would only be third, but on the strength of 10* shorthanded goals, they, along with the Wild (with 8 SH goals) pull ahead of the Canucks, who only have two such scores.

TeamPK Goals AgainstPK Goals ForPK TimeGoal Diff/ 60 Min
Montreal Canadiens3510444:26-3.38
Minnesota Wild318386:43-3.57
Vancouver Canucks322466:25-3.86
Edmonton Oilers303399:29-4.06
Nashville Predators357413:03-4.07
New Jersey Devils221287:06-4.39
Anaheim Ducks363425:16-4.66
Philadelphia Flyers396417:57-4.74
Carolina Hurricanes406429:17-4.75
Chicago Blackhawks457459:30-4.96
Ottawa Senators396392:08-5.05
Detroit Red Wings468429:13-5.31
Florida Panthers464472:36-5.33
San Jose Sharks333330:14-5.45
New York Rangers445425:14-5.50
St. Louis Blues464450:33-5.59
Calgary Flames5011416:00-5.63
Columbus Blue Jackets464447:11-5.64
Washington Capitals478413:09-5.66
Dallas Stars422417:36-5.75
Pittsburgh Penguins518413:57-6.23
Boston Bruins475394:24-6.39
Buffalo Sabres462403:04-6.55
Atlanta Thrashers546438:03-6.57
Colorado Avalanche443368:36-6.67
New York Islanders542454:10-6.87
Phoenix Coyotes563446:57-7.11
Toronto Maple Leafs583447:39-7.37
Tampa Bay Lightning476316:28-7.77
Los Angeles Kings604412:17-8.15

So, Ritch, in your dream matchup of top power play vs. top penalty kill, I'd indeed recommend pitting San Jose against Montreal. A possible extension of this analysis could look into the Shot Quality produced during these situations, to help separate the performance of the goaltender from that of the forwards and defense. For example, even though the Nashville Predators are fifth in this PK Ranking, I'd suspect much of the credit should go to Tomas Vokoun and Chris Mason, who have been spectacular all season long. On the opposite end of that scale, we may find that there are skaters on teams at the bottom of these rankings that are giving up relatively few scoring opportunities, but goaltending (hello, L.A.) is letting them down - and a savvy GM might want to look for that kind of player to help complement a team that hopes to make a run in the playoffs this spring.

*remember, I tend not to count empty-net scores in my analysis.

Popular posts from this blog

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012, which include specific revenue targets:
I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader.

It's not unreasonabl…

Canadian Baloney, starring James Mirtle

A tireless refrain from the Canadian media is that Nashville is an absolute failure as a hockey market, and failing to move the team north of the border is an exercise in folly by the NHL.

Our latest exhibit comes from James Mirtle, usually one of the more thoughtful hockey bloggers extant:
But Nashville, quite simply, has proven it cannot sustain an NHL hockey team. Even with the lowest ticket prices in the entire league (I know: I've looked into flying there for a game or two) and a ridiculously forgiving arena lease, the team has had attendance issues despite having one of the best records in the league.

It's not a matter of Canadians not wanting teams in the southern U.S.; I've argued time and again in favour of teams like Dallas and Tampa Bay that have supported their teams and really brought something to the table in terms of bringing news fans and new energy to the game. That's a good thing.

The Predators, however, are not that, not in the beginning and certainly no…

Get Your NHL Super Schedule 2008-9 Right Here!

Click here for the 2009-10 NHL Super Schedule, at my new site,!

The NHL announced the 2008-9 Regular Season schedule today, so of course, it's time right here to publish my very own NHL Super Schedule 2008-9 as well.

For those unfamiliar with what I did last year, the NHL Super Schedule is a spreadsheet that I put together and make publicly available via Google Documents*. It includes an entry for each game in each team's 82-game regular season schedule, with additional information such as how far that team has had to travel since its last game, how many days have passed since that previous game, and various statistics relative to the opponent that evening, such as 2007-8 Winning Percentage, Goals Per Game, Goals Against Per Game, etc. For example, you can total the distance that each team will travel during the upcoming season, or find who plays the most back-to-back games. Check out which team faces the toughest opposing offenses, or which power plays…