Skip to main content

Endorsements

Got any good books to recommend?

Greatest Hits from Working the Net:

Harlow Salon - one of the very best hair salons in Nashville TN.

Catching Up With PythagenPuck

As we approach the end of the year, I thought I'd look back at a previous post, and examine to what extent any (or all) of the predictions made are actually bearing fruit. Back in November, I looked at Expected Win % as a function of Goals For and Goals Against, comparing each team's actual winning percentage against what the PythagenPuck formula would predict. Typically, if you've got the team-by-team Goals For and Against numbers across an entire season, PythagenPuck calculates a winning percentage that is within 2-3% of actual results. As a simple example, if you have a team that's getting outscored on average, but is over .500 (by winning close games and losing by blowouts), it's a good bet that if that scoring trend holds, the win/loss record will sink below .500 over time.

The numbers from last month (when teams had played 16-21 games) basically indicated that the disappointing Ottawa Senators were due for a rebound, as they were the runaway underperformers in the NHL, whereas Boston, Nashville, and New Jersey stood out as being overperformers. In other words, they were winning more games than you'd expect, based on their Goals For/Against ratio. The table below reflects those figures along with updated numbers as of the games of 12/21, with teams having played 32-37 games each, roughly twice as many as from the initial analysis.

The "Nov. Exp/Act Gap" shows the difference between the actual winning percentage, and that predicted by PythagenPuck, with the underperforming Ottawa Senators shaded pink, and the overachievers shaded green. And remember, I've removed points from Shootout Wins from these numbers. You can count on anywhere from 0-10 points from SO Wins in any given season, but I'll be damned if I can figure out how to predict it.

Looking at the Current side of the table, we have updated information. The 3 teams shaded green in each column are those whose numbers have improved the most since the November article, whereas the 3 teams with steepest declines are shaded pink. So here's a few observations:

Current Expected Win %: The big leap here has been made by the Columbus Blue Jackets, who have improved their Goals For and Goals Against by about a third of a goal per game each since Gerard Gallant was let go as coach. The Boston Bruins and New York Islanders have also made huge improvements as well. On the downside, the Dallas Stars have cooled off considerably, going from .672 to .579. This has almost entirely been due to a defense that started off with a ridiculously low 1.8 Goals Against/Game, which has now crept above 2.2 (still outstanding, but not freakishly so). Minnesota and Atlanta have seen offensive dropoffs, leading to their lowered results here.

Current Actual Win %: Again, the biggest jump is by Columbus, as expected by their improvement in GF/GA. Look at the Ottawa Senators, though. Their Win % has jumped from .389 to .472, even though their GF/GA ratio has worsened slightly! That's because the Gap between Expected and Actual has closed from -.161 to -.048, which is a much more normal figure. They've been playing decently all along, and now "the breaks" are rewarding those efforts. Granted, they're not a 100-point team, but at least they have a shot to make the playoffs. The biggest fall has been by the Toronto Maple Leafs, caused mostly by a Goals Against figure that has jumped about 10% (3.34 vs. 3.05 in November).

Current Exp/Act Gap: As noted before, the faraway winner here is the Senators, who were horribly snakebit early, and are now only modestly so. Losing Jason Spezza to injury won't help in the short term, but again, at least they're in the playoff mix. The other major upside move was made by Vancouver. Yup, that's right, Canucks fans, you should consider yourselves incredibly lucky to have a 17-17-1 team!

Another note about that Current Exp/Act Gap column is that the teams at the top are currently underperforming, while those at the bottom are overperforming. So the Avalanche, Wild, and Senators should expect their fortunes to improve if they keep up their GF/GA pace, while the Capitals, Canucks, and Bruins will likely revert closer to their Expected Win % unless things radically change. Note, in particular, how the Bruins are in the process of coming back to the pack. In November, their Gap was 0.119, while today it has closed to 0.082.

Going back to the predictions from that November piece, I'd say the Senators prediction has largely come to pass. Despite slightly worse numbers for Goals For and Against, their actual winning percentage shot up by 83 points. As to the teams that were overachieving at that time, the New Jersey Devils, Boston Bruins, and Nashville Predators have significantly improved their GF/GA ratio, which has brought their Expected Win % up closer to their actual numbers. It's interesting to note that of these 4 "extreme" teams from November, three of them posted the biggest "gap shrinkage", meaning that those outlying cases are indeed trending back towards the PythagenPuck prediction.

I'll check back again on this closer to the three-quarter point of the season, and if I had to make a call today, I'd take a stab and say that Calgary and Colorado should start to pull away from the pack in the Northwest, Anaheim should continue stretching out their lead in the Western Conference, and Washington will start to fade from playoff contention. The cracks in their defense are becoming ever more apparent, and are probably to severe for Olie Kolzig to carry this team all the way into the top eight in the East.

Popular posts from this blog

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012, which include specific revenue targets:
I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader.

It's not unreasonabl…

Canadian Baloney, starring James Mirtle

A tireless refrain from the Canadian media is that Nashville is an absolute failure as a hockey market, and failing to move the team north of the border is an exercise in folly by the NHL.

Our latest exhibit comes from James Mirtle, usually one of the more thoughtful hockey bloggers extant:
But Nashville, quite simply, has proven it cannot sustain an NHL hockey team. Even with the lowest ticket prices in the entire league (I know: I've looked into flying there for a game or two) and a ridiculously forgiving arena lease, the team has had attendance issues despite having one of the best records in the league.

It's not a matter of Canadians not wanting teams in the southern U.S.; I've argued time and again in favour of teams like Dallas and Tampa Bay that have supported their teams and really brought something to the table in terms of bringing news fans and new energy to the game. That's a good thing.

The Predators, however, are not that, not in the beginning and certainly no…

Hooray for PythagenPuck

Back in November, around the quarter-mark of the NHL regular season, I wrote a piece looking at Expected Winning Percentages for each team, based on their Goals For/Goals Against ratio, using the PythagenPuck method as outlined in Alan Ryder's "Win Probabilities" article over at Hockey Analytics. Since we're approaching the end of the campaign, I thought it worth revisiting the two assertions I made back in November - that the Ottawa Senators were capable of getting back into the playoff race, and that the Boston Bruins were in danger of a freefall to the bottom of the standings.

Just to review, the basic idea behind win probability models like PythagenPuck is that over the course of a season, the Goals For and Goals Against numbers can be used to derive a team's winning percentage, within a a surprisingly narrow margin of error. For instance, if you only had GF/GA information, you could make a very good stab at projecting what the standings would look like. The w…