Skip to main content

Defending The Crease

Back in February we looked at which NHL teams were generating those precious rebound shots, dangerous offensive opportunities wherin a player fires a close-in shot within two seconds of a previous shot on goal. When controlling for factors like shot distance, type, on-ice strength (power play, penalty kill, even strength) and other factors, rebounds still remain significantly more likely to score than other shots. As the playoffs approach, and the pressure builds on those teams battling for postseason berths, these high-percentage scoring chances become critically important.

Since we've considered the offensive side of that situation, it's time to turn our attention to the defensive end of the ice. Which teams are standing strong in front of their goaltender, sweeping away loose pucks and denying position to crease-crashers like Detroit's Tomas Holmstrom, while others roll out the red carpet and leave their goaltender hanging? When looking at this statistic I prefer to keep it at the team level, because the prevention of rebounds is truly a team effort; it starts with a goaltender who can either control a shot and keep it within his pads, or play it with his stick. Watch Robert Luongo, for example, to see a goaltender whose pads appear to be made of flypaper; pucks simply don't pop away when he makes a save. After the keeper, the job falls to his defenders, who must battle opposing forwards (without drawing a penalty) for prime real estate around the crease, and/or swat pucks out of harm's way before a would-be scorer can get to them.

So let's get right to the numbers...



While there's not much surprise in seeing Calgary and San Jose atop this list, with only 77 rebound shots allowed to date, it is interesting to see Tampa Bay come in 3rd; some would say that fewer rebounds are available against the Lightning because the first shot usually goes in, but I wouldn't crack on their goaltending like that (OK, maybe I would, given their league-low .884 Save Percentage).

At the bottom end, we see some pretty lousy defensive squads; Florida, L.A., Pittsburgh and Edmonton (the bottom four by this measure) all rank in the bottom 7 teams in the league in terms of total shots on goal against, which of course will lead to more rebound opportunities against as well. Note, however, that the Boston Bruins, despite being 9th-worst in total shots against, are actually 8th-best in terms of rebounds; they may allow plenty of shots, but when push comes to shove, they don't give up many rebounds in front of Tim Thomas. I'm sure a certain 6'9" defender has something to do with that as well.

So keep an eye on these numbers as you look ahead to your team's critical matchups down the stretch; if your squad relies on banging the crease and is heading into a game in San Jose or Calgary, the goals may be especially hard to come by.

Popular posts from this blog

My goals for 2011: Make sports blogging pay off

In my never-ending quest to figure out a model for making what is currently my hobby & passion into something bringing in at least a side income, I've decided to set a couple goals for myself to complete during the rest of 2011. Simply put, I plan to publish two products over the next few months, which I hope will provide real value to hockey fans, and that they'll be willing to pay for. Will it succeed? Will it fail? The only way to know is to put my nose to the grindstone and get these two things done (I'll keep the details under my hat for now). The important thing to note is that these efforts are in addition to anything I'm doing over at OTF . Taking away what we're doing over there and asking people to pay for it is a surefire lose-lose all the way around, because if there's anything we've learned over the last few years, it's that people love to read about sports, but only for free. I'm also optimistic about Hockey Gea...

My Letter To Gary

Dear Mr. Bettman, When the announcement was made a few weeks ago that Jim Balsillie had entered into an agreement to purchase the Nashville Predators, speculation immediately began that a relocation to South Ontario would come in short order, and many hockey fans in the Nashville area jumped to the conclusion that we'd see a "Major League" scenario, whereby the new owner would deliberately undermine local support of the team so as to trigger the escape clause in the team's arena lease. As for myself, I decided to give Mr. Balsillie the benefit of the doubt - surely as a lifelong hockey fan and player, he wouldn't do such a thing after acquiring one of the best young teams in the game, with the Stanley Cup potentially within reach. I've waited and watched over recent weeks, and was initially encouraged by Balsillie's promise to field a competitive team, giving GM David Poile an ample budget to put together the best team possible. His legal representative ...

Cheer up, it's the holidays...

Why is it that various media outlets continue trying to put their own spin on the "what's wrong with the NHL" story? Our latest example comes from The Hockey News , in a piece by Jay Greenburg entitled, "Excitement Level On The Decline." Take the opening sentence: Attendance is down and yet still up from before the lockout, leaving it arguable whether buildings in New Jersey and Florida are half-full or half empty. It's no surprise that attendance is down from last season, particularly if you compare the first half of 2005-06 to the first half of this year. Coming out of the lockout, there were legions of fans starved to see the on-ice product, particularly in light of the massive rule changes. This year is more indicative of business as usual, so the fact that the league is above pre-lockout levels is a positive. Toss in the projection that overall revenues are increasing despite a 1% decrease in attendance, and I'd say that paying fans have come back ...