Skip to main content

Defending The Crease

Back in February we looked at which NHL teams were generating those precious rebound shots, dangerous offensive opportunities wherin a player fires a close-in shot within two seconds of a previous shot on goal. When controlling for factors like shot distance, type, on-ice strength (power play, penalty kill, even strength) and other factors, rebounds still remain significantly more likely to score than other shots. As the playoffs approach, and the pressure builds on those teams battling for postseason berths, these high-percentage scoring chances become critically important.

Since we've considered the offensive side of that situation, it's time to turn our attention to the defensive end of the ice. Which teams are standing strong in front of their goaltender, sweeping away loose pucks and denying position to crease-crashers like Detroit's Tomas Holmstrom, while others roll out the red carpet and leave their goaltender hanging? When looking at this statistic I prefer to keep it at the team level, because the prevention of rebounds is truly a team effort; it starts with a goaltender who can either control a shot and keep it within his pads, or play it with his stick. Watch Robert Luongo, for example, to see a goaltender whose pads appear to be made of flypaper; pucks simply don't pop away when he makes a save. After the keeper, the job falls to his defenders, who must battle opposing forwards (without drawing a penalty) for prime real estate around the crease, and/or swat pucks out of harm's way before a would-be scorer can get to them.

So let's get right to the numbers...



While there's not much surprise in seeing Calgary and San Jose atop this list, with only 77 rebound shots allowed to date, it is interesting to see Tampa Bay come in 3rd; some would say that fewer rebounds are available against the Lightning because the first shot usually goes in, but I wouldn't crack on their goaltending like that (OK, maybe I would, given their league-low .884 Save Percentage).

At the bottom end, we see some pretty lousy defensive squads; Florida, L.A., Pittsburgh and Edmonton (the bottom four by this measure) all rank in the bottom 7 teams in the league in terms of total shots on goal against, which of course will lead to more rebound opportunities against as well. Note, however, that the Boston Bruins, despite being 9th-worst in total shots against, are actually 8th-best in terms of rebounds; they may allow plenty of shots, but when push comes to shove, they don't give up many rebounds in front of Tim Thomas. I'm sure a certain 6'9" defender has something to do with that as well.

So keep an eye on these numbers as you look ahead to your team's critical matchups down the stretch; if your squad relies on banging the crease and is heading into a game in San Jose or Calgary, the goals may be especially hard to come by.

Popular posts from this blog

Cheer up, it's the holidays...

Why is it that various media outlets continue trying to put their own spin on the "what's wrong with the NHL" story? Our latest example comes from The Hockey News , in a piece by Jay Greenburg entitled, "Excitement Level On The Decline." Take the opening sentence: Attendance is down and yet still up from before the lockout, leaving it arguable whether buildings in New Jersey and Florida are half-full or half empty. It's no surprise that attendance is down from last season, particularly if you compare the first half of 2005-06 to the first half of this year. Coming out of the lockout, there were legions of fans starved to see the on-ice product, particularly in light of the massive rule changes. This year is more indicative of business as usual, so the fact that the league is above pre-lockout levels is a positive. Toss in the projection that overall revenues are increasing despite a 1% decrease in attendance, and I'd say that paying fans have come back

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012 , which include specific revenue targets: I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader. It's not unrea

Celebrating a milestone month

I've been remiss in providing regular updates on my quest to turn this whole sports-blogging hobby into at least something of a significant side income, if not a career, but good news has a way of prompting action. That, and I've been heads-down busy working on a few different fronts to push things forward...