Skip to main content

Eastern Conference Finals are set...

Now that Buffalo and Ottawa have made it to the Eastern Conference Finals, I wanted to check in how my predictive modeling performed compared to actual results. Obviously, it wasn't too far off the mark, as I did pick both the Sabres and Senators to make it through.

Just to recap, the basic idea behind this model is that I try to map out each team's offense against the opposing defense, projecting shots/game from various distances, shooting percentages, and thereby goals per game. The two key concepts are, first, an interaction between one team's offense and the other's defense (both in terms of shots allowed and goaltending), and secondly, trying to reflect recent performance by the use of exponential moving averages to represent the per-game values*.

Bufallo/New York: I was hardly alone in picking the Sabres here, as they were the top team in the regular season, although the Rangers did put up a good fight, and if they had successfully handled the final minute of Game Five, who knows what might have happened as a result. The story here appears to be one of Buffalo getting too many good scoring opportunities for Henrik Lundqvist to stop - from medium and close range, shot totals for Buffalo were well above expectations, and while New York held the overall shooting edge, as expected that numerical advantage was mostly due to outside shots, which are less dangerous.


Here's a look at Jochen Hecht's series-clinching goal for Buffalo.


New Jersey/Ottawa: I called this one in six games for the Senators, based on an impression from the numbers that goaltending was not going to be a significant edge for New Jersey (as most assumed), and a likely advantage for Ottawa in terms of both overall shot totals, as well as shots from within 29 feet. Pretty much all of that played to form, and while the level of goal-scoring was higher than predicted, the expected gap between the teams (0.47 goals per game in favor of Ottawa) was right on the money. One interesting point to be seen here is that while the Senators generated lots of close-in shots, they scored only 0.4 goals per game from the 10-19 foot range, which is far-and-away the most common scoring area. Instead, they consistently scored from all over the place.



Here's how the Sens got it done in Game Five.

So far, I'd say this method of modeling playoff matchups is working fairly well - while the exact numbers are often off the mark, the differences between teams are showing up quite clearly, and seem to be useful in predicting which team is likely to win. I'll take a look at the Anaheim/Minnesota matchup tomorrow (that's one that didn't work out as expected), and Detroit/San Jose whenever that finishes up. Since the Eastern Conference Finals won't start until Thursday (updated), I'll wait to do a preview for a couple more days.

*As always, I exclude empty-net goals from this analysis, so take that into account. Basically, empty-net goals have a negligible impact on the outcome of a game, since the team that scores one is already winning with little time left.

Popular posts from this blog

Cheer up, it's the holidays...

Why is it that various media outlets continue trying to put their own spin on the "what's wrong with the NHL" story? Our latest example comes from The Hockey News , in a piece by Jay Greenburg entitled, "Excitement Level On The Decline." Take the opening sentence: Attendance is down and yet still up from before the lockout, leaving it arguable whether buildings in New Jersey and Florida are half-full or half empty. It's no surprise that attendance is down from last season, particularly if you compare the first half of 2005-06 to the first half of this year. Coming out of the lockout, there were legions of fans starved to see the on-ice product, particularly in light of the massive rule changes. This year is more indicative of business as usual, so the fact that the league is above pre-lockout levels is a positive. Toss in the projection that overall revenues are increasing despite a 1% decrease in attendance, and I'd say that paying fans have come back

How I'm Trying To Make Money Sports Blogging

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012 , which include specific revenue targets: I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source. Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader. It's not unrea

Celebrating a milestone month

I've been remiss in providing regular updates on my quest to turn this whole sports-blogging hobby into at least something of a significant side income, if not a career, but good news has a way of prompting action. That, and I've been heads-down busy working on a few different fronts to push things forward...