"Two minutes by yourself, and you feel shame, you know.."
Take a hike over to the Globe & Mail and read Alan Ryder's latest article on the cost of penalties... it's well worth Two Minutes.
Labels: penalty, statistics
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.ontheforecheck.com/ Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 174
This page has moved to http://www.ontheforecheck.com.
NEW LOCATION! Be sure to follow "On the Forecheck" over at the new site, OnTheForecheck.com...
Take a hike over to the Globe & Mail and read Alan Ryder's latest article on the cost of penalties... it's well worth Two Minutes.
Labels: penalty, statistics
Does anyone out there know what has happened to the Predzone forums? I was just checking in, and can't get past the (disabled) login screen, which bears the message, "You can thank the Tennessean for this."
Labels: nashville predators
Now is the time of year when we start to see articles describing how winning the President's Trophy really isn't that big a deal, and that teams like Buffalo, Nashville, Detroit and Anaheim are better off taking things easy and making sure they're ready for the playoffs. After all, as quoted from this morning's Tennessean, "only six Presidents' Trophy winners have gone on to win the Stanley Cup in the 20 years the league has given out the award."
| Seed | Avg. Series Wins |
| Pres. Trophy | 2.33 |
| #1 Opp. | 1.08 |
| #2 | 1.08 |
| #3 | 1.29 |
| #4 | 1.25 |
| #5 | 0.29 |
| #6 | 0.67 |
| #7 | 0.83 |
| #8 | 0.38 |
Labels: NHL Standings, stanley cup, statistics
Today's Tennessean has a boilerplate article about how winning the President's Trophy isn't a big deal, and that "only six Presidents' Trophy winners have gone on to win the Stanley Cup in the 20 years the league has given out the award." Setting aside the notion that it's a bad idea for teams to poo-poo the importance of the regular season (shall I just save my ticket-purchasing money for the playoffs?), earning home-ice advantage throughout the playoffs is indeed worth something.
Labels: nashville predators, presidents trophy, stanley cup
Back in November, around the quarter-mark of the NHL regular season, I wrote a piece looking at Expected Winning Percentages for each team, based on their Goals For/Goals Against ratio, using the PythagenPuck method as outlined in Alan Ryder's "Win Probabilities" article over at Hockey Analytics. Since we're approaching the end of the campaign, I thought it worth revisiting the two assertions I made back in November - that the Ottawa Senators were capable of getting back into the playoff race, and that the Boston Bruins were in danger of a freefall to the bottom of the standings.
Labels: NHL Standings, ottawa senators, statistics
Hurry (and I do mean hurry) over to A Theory of Ice, for a wonderfully written piece "On Speed." Here's a snippet:
‘Hockey sense’ is actually a bit of a spooky phenomenon, like ESP, and indeed the players who have it give the eerie impression that they see the future. They are where they need to be, simply and unfailingly, even before the rest of the team realizes that someone needs to be there. They pass to the place where there teammate is going to be in a few moments, not to where he is. And a fast enough mind can, sometimes, compensate for a slow body, because a quick enough read of the play can see the game geometrically and position accordingly, rather than trying to chase it down. Forwards, maybe, can afford to have bodies faster than their minds, but a good defenseman and especially a good goalie is defined more by the ability to think faster than the opposition, rather than move faster.Sounds like a perfect description of Larry Murphy to me...
While working on a piece about the 10th anniversary of the great Colorado/Detroit game at Joe Louis Arena, I caught myself reflecting on some of the great games I've had the fortune of seeing in Detroit during the 1990's, through a variety of means. Then another thing came to mind - when I'm in attendance, the Red Wings win. I'm on a huge personal winning streak here, so perhaps the Red Wings front office would want to bolster their chances during the upcoming playoffs and make sure I'm in the house for those critical games? I can make myself available...
Labels: detroit red wings
There will be numerous posts, no doubt, celebrating the 10th anniversary of perhaps the greatest regular-season NHL game in recent memory, the duel between the Colorado Avalanche and Detroit Red Wings at Joe Louis Arena that featured Darren McCarty's pummeling of Claude Lemieux, among other epic battles. Rather than comment on the game from today's perspective, I thought I'd provide a contemporary look, as in those early days of the World Wide Web I was a columnist for a hockey website called In The Crease (now only found in the Internet Archives), and due to the hard work of our NHL editor, we had worked up enough credibility in those days that I got my first press pass to cover this highly anticipated matchup (and to think how slowly the issue of press access for bloggers has come along since then). By that point I had been writing columns online about the Red Wings for a couple years, having joined ITC after participating in innumerable newsgroup threads, and answering an ad looking for amateur hockey columnists. ITC embodied the "by the fan, for the fan" ethic that permeates today's blogosphere, and scoring a press pass was something that had never even occured to me -but when the phone call came, I jumped at the opportunity.
Hockeytown was in a fervor as the Avalanche rolled in on the 26th, marking the first time that the infamous Claude Lemieux played in Detroit since "The Hit" on Kris Draper in Game 6 of the Western Conference Finals. A local sports talk radio station had been promoting "Screw Lemieux Month", somewhat to the dismay of the Red Wings organization, and fans all over were anticipating a delicious dose of justice to be dished out by the likes of Joey Kocur, Brendan Shanahan, or Darren McCarty. Signs such as "Clobber Claude", "Are You Ready To Rumble?", and another with a gravestone already made up for "Superpest" dotted the arena.
Sure enough, that pre-game lull was much like the momentary calm you get right before the big storm that brings down the trees and knocks your power out for a week (as Detroiters have been all-too familiar with lately). Despite the fact that Kocur was scratched from the game, the fans demanded vengeance, and when Lemieux stepped on the ice he was welcomed with a shower of boos. Another interesting lineup change by Scotty Bowman had Sergei Fedorov starting on defense alongside Larry Murphy. Fedorov had played a handful of games from the blue line last season, and Bowman looked to #91 to spark the offensive transition.Labels: colorado avalanche, detroit red wings
I'm surprised I didn't already have this one in my blogroll, but be sure to check out Ingmar Bergman Shoots... and Scores! The most recent post is a great online interview with an anonymous Swedish NHL player, that gets well past the usual cliched pablum that athletes generally have to feed the mainstream media. Check it out, as it's about the most casual and open interview you'll see with an athlete these days. Some highlights:
My recent piece looking at 1st vs. 2nd Assists and the possible impact on Hart Trophy consideration generated a deluge of emails, most expressing outrage over the mere suggestion that anyone other than Sidney Crosby should be awarded the MVP this season. In particular, there was a great deal of anti-Ovechkin rhetoric, including comments like "the last time he ever passed a puck was probably at the dinner table", and others making the point that players with lots of 1st Assists (goal-scorers like Ovechkin) tend to be shooters creating only rebound opportunities rather than actually setting up their teammates.
Labels: offense, sidney crosby, statistics
Apparently New York Ranger Brendan Shanahan's post-concussion recovery is going well - this from the New York Post (link courtesy of Helene St. James of the Detroit Free Press):
Following up on the issue of whether the Nashville Predators should have congratulated Mike Modano for becoming the all-time American-born goal scoring leader in NHL history, I thought a specific instance of how such situations should be handled would help clarify things.
It's quite fashionable to bash the Nashville Predators this season, and last weekend's game against Dallas only added more voices to the chorus seemingly bent on running the Preds out of town, or as some would prefer, out of the league entirely. Since we now know that Jordin Tootoo will sit for five games for knocking out Stephane Robidas, I thought I'd toss my $0.02 in on the evening's activities:
Labels: commentary, dallas stars, nashville predators
Yeah, it's a lame topic for a post, but I'm out of town for the weekend, and got boatloads of email related to my recent article on first vs. second assists and the Hart Trophy that got posted over at FoxSports.com - apparently any gainsaying of Sidney Crosby's achievements brings the fans out in droves! Here are some of the highlights...
I like the argument as to whether or not the second assist is more or less valuable then the first, however, a major stat that gets overlooked in determining the Hart winner is the +/- rating. Do me a favor and add that factor to the computation and see if Mr. Ovechkin and his -19 rating is really worth Hart Trophy mentioning!
Sincerely, a relocated Penguin and Sid”the kid” FAN.
-Matthew
You're right, bringing +/- into the argument certainly doesn't help
Ovechkin, although we always have to remember the limitations of that
stat (namely the influence of your teammates on your numbers).
The comparison of first assists to second assists is a joke becuase in Ovechkins case the last time he ever passed a puck was probably at the dinner table. You also must look at the fact that first assists are counted on rebounds which is the only way Ovechkin will ever get an assist. If they took that away as an assist I would say your comparison has some kind of merit.
- Jeff
Ah, but creating a shot on goal that leads to a rebound opportunity is just as valuable as a pretty pass to set up a one-timer, is it not? I wasn't looking for who's the best playmaker, just trying to add a dimension to how we look at offensive production.
Say what you want to about how "great" Ovechkin is but he's a minus 19. That's awful! Crosby is a lot better than him. Jordan Staal is better, heck he is plus 20 something. That's as important of a stat as primary vs. secondary assists.
-Steve
Hmm... good point. Hey, whattaya know - Dany Heatley and Marian Hossa have even better ratings than Crosby's... +/- can indeed help illuminate things, but it's somewhat "fuzzy" as well, given the impact of who's on the ice for and against your team at any given time.
Bull.... You are digging pretty deep to discredit Sid "The Kid" - although you recovered some credibility when you stated how you earned your points. Don't forget the key plays that open the ice for the scorers and result in the goals usually happen well ahead of the puck going into the net. Do not belittle Sidney's contribution to his team and the game!!Well said, but keep in mind, I'm not saying the first vs. second
assist decides my MVP consideration, it just adds another aspect to
the analysis. I feel quite comfortable stating that in general, first
assists are worth more than seconds..
Obviously being a Penguins fan I hold a ‘little’ bit of bias towards Crosby, but when Ovechkin’s team has 60 points & Crosby’s has 88 points the debate stops there. Without Ovechkin the Caps very possibly could still have that many points, but the Pens in no way, shape, or form would be remotely close to 88. There isn’t a person on the planet that could argue that one in favor of Ovechkin. I do think Alex is a very good player, but Syd’s gonna be the man for years leading the way. You could make the statement all the way back to ‘The Great One’, though he’d still be way ahead of the pack in points, he’d have many many less.
-Eric
Just remember the Hart is for an individual, not a team. I'm sure many Pens fans pulled for Mario for a Hart trophy even though his team had some rough seasons. That said, I don't think the first vs. second assist analysis necessarily concludes that Crosby's not the best player in the league, just that the gap isn't as wide as the normal scoring standings would indicate.
Like a costumed Trekkie outside a movie theater, you need to get a life. You have way too much time on your hands. Then again, why am [I] spending time responding?
-Joe
The thing is, with wireless internet these days, I can be the costumed Trekkie outside the movie theater, and write these articles at the same time! Ain't life grand?
Keep those emails coming, folks - interaction is what makes this whole thing worthwhile.
Technorati Tags: Sidney Crosby, Alex Ovechkin
Labels: mailbag
It looks like Mike Chen's blog is back up, after a somewhat nasty hacking incident. Get over there quick, there's a poll!

It's time for the 2nd half of the Central Division showdown between Detroit and Nashville. Dominik Hasek and Chris Mason face of in goal tonight, replacing the goalies from the night before.
Labels: detroit red wings, nashville predators
With any luck I'll attempt another liveblogging tonight, of the Wings/Predators rematch at Joe Louis Arena in Detroit. First, a few thoughts and updates from last night's game:
Labels: Central, detroit red wings, nashville predators
OK, here we go - the 1st half of a home-and-home that just might settle things in what has been a very tight Central Division this season. With only a dozen games left in the season, the Red Wings are three points back with a game in hand, so two regulation victories by either team this week would open up a relatively sizeable gap at this late stage. For Nashville, a lively sellout crowd is expected, but one question will be how heavy the Red Wings support is. Traditionally, there have been a huge number of Detroit fans in the house for these games.
Labels: detroit red wings, nashville predators
Come back later on for a liveblogging* of tonight's pivotal matchup between the Red Wings and Predators for Central division supremacy, the first half of a home-and-home that concludes in Detroit tomorrow night. Will either team take charge, or will we be left with overtime results that don't settle anything? Stay tuned...
Labels: detroit red wings, nashville predators
As the 2006-7 NHL Regular Season heads into its final weeks, it's time to consider the contenders for some of the major awards. In order to add ammunition to your own barstool-style arguments over the Hart Trophy for league MVP, I thought I'd provide some statistical fodder for the debates to come.
Labels: offense, statistics
This morning I thought I'd take a stroll through the blogroll and pass along some highlights:
Sure, everybody has their pet complaint about the NHL, whether it be insufficient suspensions for violent acts, marketing failures, possible franchise moves, etc. But let's give credit to the league when it is due. An article in today's IOL out of South Africa notes that FIFA, the international governing body for soccer, is looking at NHL-style video review for goal validation. The plan is to have something in place for the 2007 Club World Cup in Tokyo.
Following Mirtle's lead once again, bizjournals.com came out last month with a comparison of which US sports markets were overextended, based on total personal income compared to the requirements of current professional sports teams located there. For example, the Tampa/St. Petersburg/Clearwater, Florida area was judged to be the most overextended, since the combined personal income of $75.6 billion supports an NFL, NHL, and MLB team. Compare that to a city like Seattle, which has three teams as well (NFL, MLB, and NBA), but boasts a total personal income of $156.6 billion*.
Labels: economics
Fresh off of Mirtle's blog, it appears the NHL is looking for a new Public Relations Manager. So brush up those resumes and send them in! What's the worst that could happen?
Labels: commentary
Following up on our look at the extent to which personal judgement might affect the compilation of the NHL's Extended Statistics, I bring you today a look at Giveaways and Takeaways. In a nutshell, the numbers seem to show once again that the level of Giveaways and Takeaways per game is primarily dependent on the site of the game, not the teams involved. Compared to the Missed Shot, Gives and Takes don't have much of a direct role relative to other hockey stats, in the sense that whether or not an official scorer calls something a Giveaway or a Takeaway doesn't impact the value of key stats such as Shots, Goals, Assists, or Saves. Nevertheless, if the NHL is going to publish statistics, it has an interest in ensuring valid data is being put out there, and what I'm seeing is a hodge-podge of data that defies logical explanation.
Labels: statistics
Labels: detroit red wings, nashville predators
Over at Kukla's Korner, Paul has put out the call for hockey website suggestions, and from the swelling list I've found a new addition for the blogroll: From Behind the Mask, an informed and amusing Sharks blog...
Labels: san jose sharks
When it comes to using the extended NHL statistics (hits, giveaways, takeaways, etc.) the question of reliability naturally comes into play. These incidents are recorded by scorers in each NHL arena, and individual interpretation is likely to yield varying results. Some allege that official scorers awards lots of Hits to the home team, or skew shot totals by the determination of a Missed Shot (if the shot would have gone wide, but the home team goalie blocked it anyway, they might call it a Shot and a Save for the goalie, boosting his stats, rather than a Missed Shot). For many people, this possibility of poor data quality turns them away from putting much value on these statistics, but the question I have today is, how much of a factor is this "judgement" aspect? Do we indeed see teams out there with inordinate results compared to the rest of the league? Let's take a look...
| GA | Shots | Missed | Save Pct. | Miss Pct. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 23 | 12 | 0.885 | 0.343 |
| 3 | 24 | 11 | 0.889 | 0.314 |
| 3 | 25 | 10 | 0.893 | 0.286 |
| 3 | 26 | 9 | 0.897 | 0.257 |
| 3 | 27 | 8 | 0.900 | 0.229 |
| 3 | 28 | 7 | 0.903 | 0.200 |
Labels: statistics
Everybody is in an uproar over the latest suspension-drawing cheap shot, that of New Jersey's Cam Janssen on Toronto's Tomas Kaberle. Janssen drew a 3-game sitdown from the league office, which is well deserved given the lateness of the hit, and the proximity to the boards.
Labels: commentary, new jersey devils, toronto maple leafs